Enter content here

TeacherTempest Book ShopOur HouseMy CookingRecent GIgsFilms - LBST120Fear LecturesSkinner FoundationB F Skinner On Having a PoemFreemasons AASRFiji SongsOpera FestivalForbidden ChristmasCreationWeddingsComputer WisdomReDistricting VermontStroke 2005Psych 310 Syllabus and ScheduleDrug UseCentered SkierBook SearchWUCC NewslettersWUCC Newsletters
Rick Rayfield
ReDistricting Vermont

2011-2012 Reapportionment of Vermont House as seen from Fayston, Mad River Valley

This is a page on my web site to stash my emails and other documents relating to the 20011-2012 Legislative Redistricting of the Vermont House.
I am an elected Justice of the Peace in Fayston, and as such a member of the Board of Civil Authority (BCA) which also includes the Selectboard and the Town Clerk.
My email is rayfieldvt@aol.com  of you have comment or corrections.   
   In August, 2011, the Legislative Apportionment Board accepted the request of Fayston to be included
a two-member district with Duxsbury, Moretown, Waitsfield, and Warren.  The Legislature will act on the
Board's recommendation in its 2012 session. 

Here is a great website with a summary of where Vermont is at with reapportionment.
 
 

Here are some numbers to keep our towns in perspective.

 

Small Potatoes

Town                 2009 est                2010 Census        Phone Bk        Voter checklist

                       VTSDC

 

Duxbury            1302                          1337                                                 

Fayston              1240                          1353                1141

Granville                                              298

Moretown          1724                          1658               1653

Northfield                                           6207

Waitsfield         1692                           1719                1659

Warren              1729                          1705                1700

Waterbury         5348                          5064

 

Big Potatoes

Chittenden      152K                            157K             

Washington      59K                               60K    

Vermont         622K                            626K

 

 

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table

 

http://crs.uvm.edu/census/

 

WHAT IS PROPOSED  IN THE JUNE L.A.B. APPORTIONMENT

Here is a PDF of the whole state with the proposed districts is map and table.

http://vermont-archives.org/reapportionment/2011HBDraftPlanandComponents.pdf

 

Fayston would be split between WAS-D  3970 and  WAS-G 3802  D for Downriver and G for Greshin?

Using the above table, Fayston's population is split 378(28%)  with Warren/Waitfield, and

   975 (72%)  with Duxbury/Moretown.

Sugarbush North and Mad RIver Glen would remain in the Waitsfield/Warren District

 

So WAS-D would be

 Fayston       975     25%

  Duxsbury   1337    34%

  Moretown  1658    42%

      total       3970

 

And WAS-G would be

  Fayston        378      10%

  Waitsfield     1719     46%

  Warren         1705      45%

    total    3802

 

If Fayston, Warren, Waitsfield is combined, like the present district we have (14% over the average size 4172)

 

Fayston        1353      29%

Waitsfield     1719     36%

 Warren         1705     36%

      total 4777

 

 So our current district would give Fayston a 29% share.  If Fayston is split, it would have 10% share in the old district with Waitsfield and Warren,  and 25% in the new district with Moretown and Duxsbury.

 

I hate to paint with a broad brush, or a political one, but we have a canvas here.

  I attach a PDF of a map showing the State towns and pie charts of how they voted for Governor last November.

 All five local towns are blue. (Schumlin (D) won.) Warren is bluest of our five local towns, followed by Waitsfield.  Fayston is in the middle, while Moretown is bluer than Duxsbury.  At least in this political measure, all towns are shades of blue. Pie.

My handout to Valley Rotary Club 13 July 2011

Vermont Legislature  ReDistricting or ReApportionment 2011-12

  Apportionment Board began Nov 2010 with seven members with 2010 census

 Tom Little appointed by Vt Supreme Court,  plus 2 Rep, 2 Dem, 2 Progressives

  Minutes on-line http://vermont-archives.org/reapportionment/calendar.htm Feisty.

  Good summary at http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Redistricting_in_Vermont

Vermont population grew only 3%, but lots of shifts within State. Burl +9

*150 House seats per Vermont Constitution, from one seat per Town in 1965

*626,000 people in VT-  House seat needs 4172 people plus/minus 10% by federal law and court interpretation of Vermont law. (total 20% from least to most people per rep)

 

* Fayston + Waitsfield + Warren =  4777,   14% over 4172 target   MUST FIX

 

* Previous solutions: Warren+ Waitsfield+ Granville     Fayston+Buels Gore +?

                                Fayston +Moretown    Fay+Mor+Dux+Waits+War

 

* Current Solution  Warren+ Waitsfield + 378 Fayston  3990     (45, 46, 10%)

                              Moretown + Duxsbury + 975 Fayston  3970   (42, 43, 25%)

     No solution gives any town a majority.  Fayston is split along Rte 17.

     Party politics are fairly even across these five towns, getting gradually more Rep as heading north based on 2010 Gov race.

            Duxsbury   1337                                Vermont             626,000

Fayston      1353                                  Chittenden Cty 157,000

Granville      298                                 Washington Cty  60,000

Moretown  1658

Northfield  6207                                   Current report June 1

Waitsfield  1719                                   BCAs can comment until Aug 1

Warren      1705                                   Senate also redistricting; fewer issues

Waterbury 5064

The Apportionment Board is split 4 to 3 in favor of single member districts, and this is a contentious issue.  40 States demand single member districts.  In the past, the Legislature- deciding again in 2012, barring Court challenges- has always agreed with anything that local BCAs have agreed on. SO multi-rep districts may continue in cities.

 

BCA- Board of Civil Authority-  Selectboard,  Town Clerk,  Justices of the Peace

   Main duties BCA (which is why Justices of the Peace are supposed to be nominated from major parties and voted in general election, not Town Meeting) are maintaining voter checklist, supervising elections, counting ballots, hearing tax appeals.

Split town (18 now) can have one polling place; State pays for second scanner if needed.

Choices: 

  1. Fight & lose Court  challenge for -14% underrepresented 2002 Fayston/Waitsfield/Warren district.
  2. Accept the proposal for Waitsfield/Warren/split Fayston  and Moretown/Duxsbury/split Fayston districts as proposed
  3. Request a two-member district for Duxs/Fay/More/Waits/Warren.
  4.  Something else                                                             Rick Rayfield 071311

To: Fayston BCA (originally)
  Here  is a draft of a list of connections Fayston has with the Mad River Valley.   It may seem obvious, perhaps overkill.  But it may not be obvious to people outside Fayston, or outside the Valley.  I invite corrections and additions.  We don't need to beat this one to death, emotional as it is. It is pretty obvious.
 
   The list also may serve to help us see how Moretown and Duxsbury, at least in part, belong to the Mad River Valley.  I am still digesting facts and numbers and looking for other viewpoints.  I am thinking that the proposed reapportionment  gives the broader Mad River Valley community a second representative.  The cost is splitting Fayston for this purpose.  But we have now learned that the slpit would not require a second polling place,  and if a second voting machine is required, the State would pay for it.   Several people from Moretown, including Rep Maxine Grad ( a likely incumbent, and frequent contributor to the local Valley Reporter)  have said that Moretown is identified with the Mad River Valley.  Duxsbury straddles the Valley and Waterbury and I do not have a sense of the town as a whole.
 
 I have looked at the arguments for shifting to one-representative districts State-wide.  I come from a land of three-member districts, with bizzare 1 1/12 vote split ballots and three-vote bullets.  They actually made sense in Chicago, but what a price in voting complexity. The Machine took control anyway.  I am strongly in favor of the move to single representative districts in Vermont.  The best evidence, for me, is to look at the multiple-member districts to see if minority groups are getting representation there.  I do not see it working for that purpose in Vermont. We are indeed still partisan, but far more issue oriented than polarized on local issues.
 
Best,

Rick
 
 
 
   DRAFT 9 July 2011-07-09
 
    The connections of Fayston to the Mad River Valley are obvious to people who live here. They may not be obvious to people outside the Valley, or even to many people living in towns where the Mad River actually runs.  This DRAFT may have some factual errors to fix, and certainly can be expanded.  Please send back comments of all sorts.
 
 Here are some of Fayston’s connections to the Mad River Valley,
 
  1. Both Sugarbush North and Mad River Glen ski areas are in Fayston
 
  1. Fayston’s Grand List includes ski clubs, and second home owners drawn to the Valley
 
  1.  Fayston is part of the Mad River Planning District and the Mad River Recreation District.   The Mad River Path Association. Other districts (Conservation? Friends of Mad River?)
 
    4  All Roads out of Fayston lead to the Mad River Valley,  except Rte 17W.
               One road leads to Warren,  eight roads cross to Waitsfield. The town road crews in Fayston and Waitsfield have some shared maintenance agreements.
 
5        Fayston and Waitsfield share a volunteer fire department.
 
6        Fayston and the Mad River Valley share the Mad River Valley Ambulance.
 
7        Fayston has no business district or post office of it own. It is split between 05673 and 05660 zip codes (Waitsfield and Moretown)
 
8        Fayston, Waitsfield, Warren and Moretown share the Harwood Middle School.
Waterbury and Duxsbury have Crossett Brook Middle School.
 
9         Fayston has no churches of its own; but Waitsfield and Warren and Moretown have at least five active churches which are attended by people from Fayston. The Valley clergy are organized Valley-wide as the  Interfaith Clergy Council.
 
10      Fayston’s elementary school is at the south end of town, but serves the whole town.

 

11     Fayston makes a large contribution to the Joslin Memorial Library in Waitsfield.
 
12      Youth sports leagues- like Little League, T ball, soccer, etc. are organized for the
whole Mad River Valley, including Fayston and Moretown.  So is the Mad River Valley Co-Ed Softball League.
 
13     Fayston is an active community, not just a bedroom community or farm and forest. The following farms and home occupations in Fayston have web sites or marketing materials that identify their location in the Mad River Valley, or even in Waitsfield (for mailing).
             Vermont Icelandic Horse Farm, Shepherds Brook Auto and Restoration, Recovery Room,  MusicCraft, Lindsay Custom Builders and Design, Vermont Spice of Life, Mad River Barn, Mad River building and Design, Eastman Long  Maple Syrup, Vasseur maple syrup, Mad River Veterinary Service, Millbrook Inn, White Horse Inn,  Hyde Away Inn,  Mountain View Inn.  Atii Sled Dogs, et al.  More?
 
14    Fayston does not have a post office. Fayston residents get home delivery mail based out of Waitsfield or Moretown,  or they have PO Boxes, in Waitsfield and Moretown.
 
15     All of Fayston, including Shepherd Brook and Mill Brook, and eight small streams drain into the Mad River.  These are also fishing streams considered by fisherman as part of the Mad River Valley.
 
16     There are properties which overlap Fayston/Waitsfield, and Fayston/Duxsbury.
 
17     Historically….oh boy, where to start... lots and lots.
 
18     Rotary,  Freemasons, Lions, Oddfellows, Gardening Club, Couples Club, The Community Fund, the Food Shelf, Valley Players, and other organizations draw membership from and serve the whole Mad River Valley.
 
19    The Mad River Valley Chamber of Commerce serves and supports the whole Valley.
 
20    The local phone, DSL, and cable cable company serves the whole Mad River Valley.  It lists facts and figures for four towns in the local phone book: Fayston, Moretown, Waitsfield, and Warren.   The independent public access TV station MRVTV, with two channels, has programming for Fayston, Waitsfield, and Warren Town affairs, programming for the whole Valley including schools, and includes a Duxsbury member on its Board.
 
21   Green Mountain Valley School is a major  economic factor in the Valley (under-noticed as such), located in Fayston but with activities Valley-wide.
 
 22   The Valley Reporter, our local paper, includes Fayston, Duxsbury, Moretown, Waitsfield, Warren, and Waterbury on its masthead, has advertising, news, and business connections in all those towns,  most strongly Fayston, Moretown, Waitsfield, and Warren, and has served the Valley admirably for decades.
 
23   More?    Of course.  Corrections too.   Send them to me and I will update this.
 
Rick Rayfield
Justice of the Peace, Fayston BCA